Lessons
Learned
from
Cambodia
Development
Lessons learned at:
Individual level
Organizational level
Cambodian society level
| |
Lessons learned
at
individual level
|
|
In Cambodian, when talking about development, we often want to
see positive change. During the last decade of practice, it
confirmed us that there were many positive physical changes and
changes in professional skills and knowledge of Cambodian
development practitioners, but it still difficult to see
significant changes in people attitudes toward learning and
practicing new things or doing things in a new way. The reason
for no change is often not caused by knowledge gap.
We can conclude that the post trauma from Khmer Rouge has
negative influence on leaning ability of Cambodian people. Many
work still need to be patiently done to heal the trauma so that
Cambodians can unlearn and move forward constructively.
We learned that in the current Cambodian development, there was
little emphasis on learning how to learn as many people assume
that they can automatically learn. Furthermore, in the Cambodian
context, learners seem reluctant to take responsibility as an
active learner. Individual sustainability not comes from the
ability to copy and past, but mostly from the learning ability
as an effective learner.
There are different motivations between learning need and
request, so we can only provide effective capacity intervention
when we clarify them. If we want to achieve changes as leaning
outcomes, we always face tensions with Cambodian learners’
expectations as they still prefer traditional (comfortable) way
for learning process, in which facilitators need to respond to
what they want.
It confirmed me that in Cambodia, boss does not like to learn
from the subordinate. However, being an effective need to
consider learning from all dimensions, i.e. learning from boss,
from peer colleagues, and from subordinates. A boss, who fails
to listen and learn from his/her subordinates, will lose a big
part of the learning opportunities.
There is really a difference between doing a job and help others
to be able matter to do the job. A person, who has many
practical experiences, does not automatically mean that s/he can
facilitate other to learn effectively. In opposite to that, a
facilitator cannot help the learners to learn effectively when
s/he has no practical experience. Practical experience and
facilitation skills need to be together so that capacity
building interventions can be effective.
A proverb said, “You cannot teach old dog with new tricks”, but
in return some old dogs can teach you some tricks and
experience. In case the old dog is your boss, the tricks and
experience s/he teaches you can be useful or painful. Please be
careful in using the word “dog” in Cambodian context as it mean
“stupid”, and make people angry.
We learned that for the Cambodia’s development, we cannot avoid
not working with expatriates. In the working relationship,
Cambodians should not assume that expatriates know everything.
We can exchange our experience and learn from each others. The
hierarchical relationship between expatriates and Cambodians as
well as the Cambodian perspective of viewing expatriate advisors
as bosses were not helpful for long-term Cambodia’s development.
I learned that the Cambodians can never expect to be as equal as
expatriates because in the reality we never. Furthermore, we
also learned that Cambodia’s development might still remain
ineffective when the expatriates are still doing the work for
the Cambodians instead of facilitating them to do the work for
their country. Many expatriates are still speaking n behalf of
Cambodians.
We learned that, as an impact from the post trauma, many
Cambodians are not daring to try new things, so they wait to see
other people doing things in a risk-free context, so that they
can follow to try. However, it was difficult to good individual
role modeler in development as people were facing risk when
doing so.
| |
Lessons learned
at
organizational level |
 |
It confirmed us that we can improve our practice by taking time
to make a serious and systematic reflection, through which we
can draw lessons learned. We have to turn our lessons learned
into actions; otherwise we will repeat the mistakes again. In
organizational leaning, development concepts from elsewhere
should be adapted to the Cambodian context so that they can be
relevant and applicable.
It is natural that organizations are lack of some internal good
practice, but if the issue become serious (such as nepotism, big
management and leadership issues…), then the impact made with
the beneficiaries is limited.
|
|
The differences between
me and my boss
When I take a long time to finish, I am slow,
When my boss takes a long time, she is thorough
When I don't do it, I am lazy,
When my boss does not do it, she is busy,
When I do something without being told, I am trying to be
smart,
When my boss does the same, she takes the initiative,
When I please my boss, I am apple polishing,
When my boss pleases her boss, she is cooperating,
When I make a mistake, I' am an idiot.
When my boss makes a mistake, she's only human.
When I am out of the office, I am wandering around.
When my boss is out of the office, she's on business.
When I am on a day off sick, I am always sick.
When my boss is a day off sick, she must be very ill.
When I apply for leave, I must be going for an interview.
Source:
Unknown
|
|
We leaned that NGOs are institute to facilitate positive change,
but they often struggle to change within themselves. Many NGO
directors (both Cambodian and expatriate Directors) are so
powerful in their organizations. They have the full “control”
over the rest of the staff in their Kingdom. While some
Directors tried to build capacity and encouraged their staff to
develop and grow, many other Directors have less commitment to
make space for their staff to grow as they felt they might lose
control when their staff becomes competent and assertive.
We can conclude that in Cambodia development sector, expatriates
have been working in organizations to build capacity of
Cambodian staff, but in many cases, we have not achieved the
outcomes as desired. Many aspects of the root causes still need
to be determined.
Many Cambodians learned that the localization of an organization
often takes place in the decay phase, so that Cambodian leaders
do not have a chance to learn practicing the highest position
during a stable organizational situation. A fear of Cambodian
leader of localization is no fund.
We learned that there was different understanding towards the
root causes of a problem. There were some approaches and
strategies that aim to address the symptoms rather than causes.
In the development work, the word “empower” sounds not helpful
when it translated into Khmer.
| |
Lessons leaned
at
Cambodian society level |
|
It confirmed us
that while the small percentage of Cambodians (especially those
who live in the city) has improved their living standard
significantly, we have to recognize that the majority of
Cambodians remain very poor.
We learned that, in
the Cambodian history, Cambodians were rare able to solve their
internal conflict by themselves. Often, foreign support was
needed to solve the problem, and the country remains depending
on foreign aid.
We learned that
many unhelpful Cambodian patterns were developed from the past
Cambodian historical, social-cultural forces. These patterns
such as lack of
confidence, lack of trust, fearful behaviors etc. can not be
easily changed. Corruption becomes a chronic Cambodian social
disease that cannot be healed easily.
We learned that Cambodian development practitioners are
living with two types of values, the exposed values that they
are promoting in their work, and the in-used values that they
practice in their everyday life in their home community.
We learned that there seem a negative image in Cambodian
people’s mind when the term “opposition party” is introduced,
which lead to political discrimination activities in Cambodia.
The issue might come from the Khmer translation.
It confirmed us that many Cambodians seem stressful in their
life, and as a solution, they try to escape to other country
whatever they can. It becomes an endless escape…